Friday, September 27, 2013

Vanderbilt v. Gerry DiNardo

Parties:Vanderbilt University (Plaintiff/Appellee) v.Gerry DiNardo(Defendant/Appellant) Facts: On December 3, 1990, Vanderbilt and DiNardo executed an employment bless hiring DiNardo to be Vanderbilts head football coach. On August 14, 1994, Paul Hoolahan, Vanderbilts acrobatic Director, went to Bell Buckle, Tennessee, where the football team was practicing, to talk to DiNardo about a gravel extension. In November 1994, Louisiana State University contacted Vanderbilt in hopes of vox with DiNardo about becoming the head football coach for L.S.U. Hoolahan gave DiNardo license to speak to L.S.U. about the position. On December 12, 1994, DiNardo announced that he was accepting the L.S.U. position. Vanderbilt sent a demand letter to DiNardo desire payment of liquidated change chthonic partitioning eight of the contract. Vanderbilt believed that DiNardo was apt(p) for 3 social classs of his net salary: one year low the original contract and both years under the appurtenance. DiNardo did non respond to Vanderbilts demand for payment. History: Vanderbilt brought the bodily process against DiNardo for breach of contract. DiNardo withdraw the action to federal tap, and both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The district court held that section eight was an enforceable liquidated amends provision, not an immoral penalisation, and that the damages provided under section eight were reasonable.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The court held that Vanderbilt did not quit its contractual rights under section eight when it give DiNardo leave to talk to L.S.U. and that the Addendum was enforceabl e and extended the contract for two years. T! he court entered judgment against DiNardo for $281,886.43. Dinardo appeals to U.S. District court. Issues: Is section 8 of the contract an enforceable liquidated damage provision and not an guilty penalty under Tennessee law and did Vanderbilt waive its right to liquidated damages? Was the Addendum to the contract enforceable? Was the Addendum not a legitimate and binding contract? Rules... If you want to get a all-embracing essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment